Joe Leather vs Ilgiz Kamchibekov Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Leather vs Kamchibekov analysis and find out who is favored!
Joe Leather vs Ilgiz Kamchibekov Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Leather 1 - 0 Kamchibekov
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Leather has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Kamchibekov has won 47.85%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Leather, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Kamchibekov has won 49.04%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 35.22% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Leather has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Kamchibekov has saved 55.81% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Leather has won 66.67% of matches played (W/L 8/ 4), with Kamchibekov winning 33.33% (W/L 12/ 24) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Leather has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 70% (W/L 7/ 3), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Kamchibekov has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 43% (W/L 3/ 4), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 8% (W/L 1/ 11).
- Player level: In the last year, Leather has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 66.67% of matches (W/L 8/ 4), where as Kamchibekov has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 33.33% of matches (W/L 12/ 24). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Leather winning 1 times and Kamchibekov being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Leather winning 2 and Kamchibekov winning 0. The last match between Leather and Kamchibekov was at the M15 Sharm ElSheikh, 08-10-2023, Q1 round, Hard with Joe Leather getting the victory 7-6(2) 6-1.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Leather and Kamchibekov have played a deciding set 0 times, with Leather winning 0 times and Kamchibekov 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Leather winning 1, and Kamchibekov 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Leather has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Kamchibekov has played against players with an average rank of 19.06.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Leather has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Kamchibekov has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Leather has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Kamchibekov has converted 57.58% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Joe Leather
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
23
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
19
Age
Plays
Ilgiz Kamchibekov
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
Form
L
W
L
L
L
L
W
W
L
L
62% (8-5)
Career Total W/L
28% (13-34)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
31% (5-11)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Leather VS Kamchibekov H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
stats | Joe Leather | Ilgiz Kamchibekov |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 13 | 7 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Leather VS Kamchibekov H2h Matches played
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
7-6(2) 6-1 |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Joe Leather | Ilgiz Kamchibekov |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 31% (5/11) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 32% (12/25) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 43% (152/200) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 22% (2/7) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 60% (3/2) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0.14 |
Aces Total | 0 | 24 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0.1 |
DFs Total | 0 | 17 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 42.88 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 62% (267/431) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 67% (179/267) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 48% (78/163) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 58% (19/33) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 41% (164/404) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 31% (5/11) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 31% (5/16) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 75% (3/4) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 60% (3/5) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (5/5) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (5/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (11/0) |
Joe Leather Recent Matches Played
Before:
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
George Houghton
Player
Joe Leather
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve %
81%
(
48 of
59)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
90%
(
28 of
31)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
7 of
11)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
16%
(
7 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
63
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Joe Leather
Player
Daniel Tiboldi
79%
(
38 of
48)
1st Serve %
57%
(
28 of
49)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
21%
(
10 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
65
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Grigory Shebekin
Player
Joe Leather
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve %
64%
(
39 of
61)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
24 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
72
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-1 3-0 ret. | H2H | |||
Q1 | 7-6(2) 6-1 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Andrea Militi Ribaldi
Player
Joe Leather
65%
(
54 of
83)
1st Serve %
71%
(
69 of
97)
3
Aces
10
7
Double Faults
4
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
45 of
69)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
41%
(
34 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
43 of
97)
92
Total Points Won
88
|
7-5 1-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Joe Leather
Player
Anthony Popyrin
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve %
58%
(
35 of
60)
5
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
5
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
24 of
35)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
10 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
60)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Pierre Delage
Player
Joe Leather
56%
(
45 of
81)
1st Serve %
62%
(
68 of
109)
6
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
4
82%
(
37 of
45)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
47 of
68)
56%
(
20 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
30%
(
24 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
42 of
109)
99
Total Points Won
91
|
3-6 7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H |
view more
Ilgiz Kamchibekov Recent Matches Played
Before:
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Venedikt Tsirikidze
Player
Ilgiz Kamchibekov
61%
(
63 of
103)
1st Serve %
70%
(
78 of
111)
6
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
2
73%
(
46 of
63)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
53 of
78)
60%
(
24 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
32%
(
33 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
41 of
111)
111
Total Points Won
103
|
7-6(6) 6-7(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF | 7-6(6) 3-6 10-7 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-3 3-6 10-6 | H2H | |||
Q1 |
Saveliy Ivanov
Player
Ilgiz Kamchibekov
55%
(
29 of
53)
1st Serve %
48%
(
27 of
56)
1
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
66%
(
19 of
29)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
20 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-3 3-0 ret. | H2H | |||
QF | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 |
Ilgiz Kamchibekov
Player
Jay Lin Gibson
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve %
72%
(
33 of
46)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
9 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
55
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Amir Milushev
Player
Ilgiz Kamchibekov
61%
(
65 of
106)
1st Serve %
61%
(
71 of
116)
6
Aces
2
9
Double Faults
10
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
46 of
71)
54%
(
22 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
14 of
45)
39%
(
7 of
18)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
40%
(
42 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
56 of
116)
120
Total Points Won
102
|
6-4 6-7(7) 6-2 | H2H |
view more